FRWD vs VOO

FRWD vs VOO

Which is better, FRWD or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFRWDVOO
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$274M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings54506
YTD Return+24.83%Best+13.57%
1Y Return-+17.55%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight56.0%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyNomura Asset Management Co LtdVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 13, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FRWD vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FRWD vs VOO Performance

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FRWD is up 24.83% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FRWD charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRWD currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

FRWD already in VOO56.7%
VOO already in FRWD28.0%

56.7% of FRWD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.0% of VOO's money is in holdings FRWD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 504 in VOO, against full books of 54 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 485 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FRWD (71.8% of the fund), and 5 for FRWD that do not appear in VOO (13.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FRWDWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.32%8.09%1.23%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.54%5.70%2.16%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc7.60%1.16%6.44%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.89%3.85%0.96%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity5.76%0.57%5.19%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.18%3.01%0.17%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.52%2.65%0.87%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.42%1.64%1.78%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.3.93%0.23%3.70%
TXNTexas Instruments, Inc.3.77%0.36%3.41%

56.7% of FRWD is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FRWDVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FRWD or VOO?

FRWD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FRWD and VOO?

56.7% of FRWD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.0% of VOO's is in holdings FRWD also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, FRWD or VOO?

FRWD yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than FRWD?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.