FSCC vs RUSC
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF vs Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, FSCC or RUSC?
Nearly the same fund. FSCC costs less.
FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC led over the full window, RUSC over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSCC | RUSC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36%Best | 0.64% |
| AUM | $427M | $81M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.24% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 622 | 491 |
| YTD Return | +10.38% | +13.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.30% | +17.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.1% | -9.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,365Best | $13,328 |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.8% | 5.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | May 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
FSCC vs RUSC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
FSCC vs RUSC Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF (RUSC) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year FSCC returned +12.30% while RUSC returned +17.59%. Year to date, FSCC is up 10.38% versus a gain of 13.09% for RUSC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.3% for RUSC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.1% for FSCC and -9.8% for RUSC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSCC charges 0.36% per year while RUSC charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $64 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSCC currently yields 0.24% against 0.33% for RUSC.
Holdings Overlap
21.1% of FSCC's money is in holdings RUSC also owns. 16.3% of RUSC's money is in holdings FSCC also owns.
FSCC and RUSC share little of their money.
69 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 489 in RUSC, against full books of 622 and 491.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 312 positions for RUSC that do not appear in our book for FSCC (61.8% of the fund), and 224 for FSCC that do not appear in RUSC (75.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSCC | Weight in RUSC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNOCno Financial Group Inc | 0.95% | 0.22% | 0.73% |
| KLICKulicke & Soffa Industries | 0.90% | 0.23% | 0.67% |
| BKUBankunited Inc | 1.01% | 0.12% | 0.89% |
| FLRFluor Corp | 0.77% | 0.28% | 0.49% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.62% | 0.38% | 0.24% |
| BTSGBrightspring Health | 0.79% | 0.19% | 0.60% |
| AXSMAxsome Therapeutics Inc | 0.60% | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| PTCTPtc Therapeutics Inc | 0.54% | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp. | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.23% |
| FBKFb Financial Corp | 0.60% | 0.21% | 0.39% |
21.1% of FSCC is already inside RUSC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSCC or RUSC?
FSCC has an expense ratio of 0.36% while RUSC charges 0.64%. FSCC is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FSCC or RUSC?
Over the past year FSCC returned +12.30% vs +17.59% for RUSC, so RUSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FSCC annualized +23.02% vs +22.78% for RUSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FSCC or RUSC?
FSCC has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.3% for RUSC. Worst drawdown: FSCC -11.1% vs RUSC -9.8%.
Should I hold both FSCC and RUSC?
FSCC and RUSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FSCC and RUSC?
21.1% of FSCC's money is in holdings RUSC also owns. 16.3% of RUSC's is in holdings FSCC also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 489 in RUSC.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSCC or RUSC?
FSCC yields 0.24% while RUSC yields 0.33%, so RUSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RUSC better than FSCC?
FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC led over the full window, RUSC over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. RUSC is less concentrated, with 5.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.