FSCC vs SEIS
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF vs SEI Select Small Cap ETF
Which is better, FSCC or SEIS?
Nearly the same fund. FSCC costs less.
FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. SEIS is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSCC | SEIS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $427M | $607M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.24% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 622 | 767 |
| YTD Return | +10.38%Best | +10.36% |
| 1Y Return | +12.30%Best | +11.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 18.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.2% | -25.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,030Best | $12,417 |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.8% | 10.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Oct 8, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
FSCC vs SEIS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
FSCC vs SEIS Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS. Over the past year FSCC returned +12.30% while SEIS returned +11.88%. Year to date, FSCC is up 10.38% versus a gain of 10.36% for SEIS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 18.4% for SEIS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.2% for FSCC and -25.7% for SEIS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSCC charges 0.36% per year while SEIS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $55 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSCC currently yields 0.24% against 0.35% for SEIS.
Holdings Overlap
36.8% of FSCC's money is in holdings SEIS also owns. 31.2% of SEIS's money is in holdings FSCC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
103 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 369 in SEIS, against full books of 622 and 767.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 249 positions for SEIS that do not appear in our book for FSCC (63.9% of the fund), and 190 for FSCC that do not appear in SEIS (60.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSCC | Weight in SEIS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNOCno Financial Group Inc | 0.95% | 1.27% | 0.32% |
| WTSWatts Water Technologies Inc | 0.66% | 1.07% | 0.41% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.39% |
| ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.29% |
| DKDelek Us Holdings Inc | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.02% |
| BSIGBrightsphere Investment Group Plc | 0.93% | 0.62% | 0.31% |
| BTSGBrightspring Health | 0.79% | 0.65% | 0.14% |
| CMCCommercial Metals Co | 0.53% | 0.88% | 0.35% |
| TALOTalos Energy Inc | 0.90% | 0.38% | 0.52% |
| INDV:MBIndivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ordinary Shares | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.87% |
36.8% of FSCC is already inside SEIS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSCC or SEIS?
FSCC has an expense ratio of 0.36% while SEIS charges 0.55%. FSCC is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FSCC or SEIS?
Over the past year FSCC returned +12.30% vs +11.88% for SEIS, so FSCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FSCC annualized +14.15% vs +11.43% for SEIS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FSCC or SEIS?
FSCC has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 18.4% for SEIS. Worst drawdown: FSCC -27.2% vs SEIS -25.7%.
Should I hold both FSCC and SEIS?
FSCC and SEIS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FSCC and SEIS?
36.8% of FSCC's money is in holdings SEIS also owns. 31.2% of SEIS's is in holdings FSCC also owns. They hold 103 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 369 in SEIS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSCC or SEIS?
FSCC yields 0.24% while SEIS yields 0.35%, so SEIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SEIS better than FSCC?
FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. SEIS is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.