FSEG vs IVV
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FSEG or IVV?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FSEG is less concentrated, with 9.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSEG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 917 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.18% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.1%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 28, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FSEG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSEG vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Growth ETF (FSEG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FSEG is up 0.18% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSEG charges 0.28% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSEG currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of FSEG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FSEG also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 465 positions we hold weights for in FSEG and 506 in IVV, against full books of 917 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 499 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FSEG (99.3% of the fund), and 441 for FSEG that do not appear in IVV (95.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSEG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 0.27% | 0.12% | 0.15% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSEG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSEG or IVV?
FSEG has an expense ratio of 0.28% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSEG or IVV?
FSEG yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FSEG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FSEG is less concentrated, with 9.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.