FSPC vs VTI

FSPC vs VTI

Which is better, FSPC or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFSPCVTI
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings1033,524
YTD Return-10.89%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight45.6%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FSPC vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FSPC vs VTI Performance

First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF (FSPC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSPC is down 10.89% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FSPC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPC currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

FSPC already in VTI58.5%
VTI already in FSPC1.5%

58.5% of FSPC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FSPC also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

26 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 103 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FSPC (96.1% of the fund), and 1 for FSPC that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FSPCWeight in VTIDifference
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc4.92%0.55%4.37%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies4.97%0.11%4.86%
SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a''4.70%0.02%4.68%
NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp.4.42%0.10%4.32%
VSATViasat Inc4.39%0.01%4.38%
LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc.3.97%0.07%3.90%
RKLBRocket Lab Corp3.72%0.05%3.67%
ASTSAst Spacemobile Inc Class A3.48%0.02%3.46%
LMTLockheed Martin3.12%0.18%2.94%
HONHoneywell International Inc.3.15%0.09%3.06%

58.5% of FSPC is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FSPCVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FSPC or VTI?

FSPC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FSPC and VTI?

58.5% of FSPC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's is in holdings FSPC also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSPC or VTI?

FSPC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FSPC?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.