FTCS vs GOP
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs Subversive Congressional Republicans Trading ETF
Which is better, FTCS or GOP?
GOP has been ahead.
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. GOP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | GOP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52%Best | 0.73% |
| AUM | $7.5B | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.56% |
| Holdings | 102 | 141 |
| YTD Return | +6.41% | +19.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +22.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +21.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.06% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 13.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -20.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $13,662 | $17,781Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 38.4% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Subversive Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).
FTCS vs GOP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
FTCS vs GOP Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Subversive Congressional Republicans Trading ETF (GOP) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% while GOP returned +22.08%. Year to date, FTCS is up 6.41% versus a gain of 19.48% for GOP.
Over three years, FTCS compounded at +10.51% per year against +21.66% for GOP. Across the full 4-year window we track, GOP has the edge at +16.83% annualized vs +8.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 11.0% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for FTCS and -20.7% for GOP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while GOP charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $73 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.56% for GOP.
Holdings Overlap
22.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings GOP also owns. 5.0% of GOP's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
FTCS and GOP share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 135 in GOP, against full books of 102 and 141.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 117 positions for GOP that do not appear in our book for FTCS (89.3% of the fund), and 39 for FTCS that do not appear in GOP (77.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in GOP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.09% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.08% | 0.56% | 1.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.07% | 0.57% | 1.50% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 2.10% | 0.46% | 1.64% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.05% | 0.45% | 1.60% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.93% | 0.55% | 1.38% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.27% | 0.15% | 2.12% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.17% | 0.19% | 1.98% |
| SCHWSchwab (Charles) Corp | 1.97% | 0.25% | 1.72% |
| CBChubb Limited Common Stock | 1.94% | 0.27% | 1.67% |
22.6% of FTCS is already inside GOP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or GOP?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while GOP charges 0.73%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCS or GOP?
Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% vs +22.08% for GOP, so GOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTCS annualized +8.80% vs +16.83% for GOP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCS or GOP?
GOP has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 11.0% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: FTCS -12.6% vs GOP -20.7%.
Should I hold both FTCS and GOP?
FTCS and GOP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and GOP?
22.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings GOP also owns. 5.0% of GOP's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 135 in GOP.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or GOP?
FTCS yields 1.22% while GOP yields 0.56%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GOP better than FTCS?
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. GOP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.