FTCS vs HRSK
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF
Which is better, FTCS or HRSK?
FTCS costs less.
FTCS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | HRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $7.5B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 102 | 121 |
| YTD Return | +7.80%Best | +0.16% |
| 1Y Return | +7.60% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.98% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.21% | - |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | TOEWS Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTCS vs HRSK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTCS vs HRSK Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF (HRSK) is an ETF from TOEWS Funds. Year to date, FTCS is up 7.80% versus a gain of 0.16% for HRSK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while HRSK charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $95 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.00% for HRSK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 28.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings HRSK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HRSK, our book for it covers 58.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FTCS and HRSK share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 117 in HRSK, against full books of 102 and 121.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in HRSK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.07% | 3.03% | 0.96% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.89% | 0.86% | 1.03% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.34% | 0.25% | 2.09% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.27% | 0.21% | 2.06% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.17% | 0.17% | 2.00% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.23% | 0.05% | 2.18% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.08% | 0.19% | 1.89% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.73% | 0.50% | 1.23% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.15% | 0.06% | 2.09% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.05% | 0.16% | 1.89% |
28.8% of FTCS is already inside HRSK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or HRSK?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while HRSK charges 0.95%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and HRSK?
At least 28.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings HRSK also owns. Our book for HRSK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 117 in HRSK.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or HRSK?
FTCS yields 1.22% while HRSK yields 0.00%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRSK better than FTCS?
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.