FTCS vs JUDO

FTCS vs JUDO

Which is better, FTCS or JUDO?

FTCS costs less.

FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%.

Lower Fees: FTCSLess Concentrated: FTCS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTCSJUDO
Expense Ratio0.52%Best0.55%
AUM$7.5B$8M
Dividend Yield1.22%2.87%
Holdings102128
YTD Return+7.80%+13.22%Best
1Y Return+7.60%-
3Y Return (annualized)+10.98%-
5Y Return (annualized)+6.21%-
Top 10 Weight22.5%Best41.7%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Janus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 6, 2006Mar 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FTCS vs JUDO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FTCS against instead:FTCS vs SPYFTCS vs QQQFTCS vs VOOFTCS vs VTIJUDO against:JUDO vs VXUS

FTCS vs JUDO Performance

First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Year to date, FTCS is up 7.80% versus a gain of 13.22% for JUDO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FTCS charges 0.52% per year while JUDO charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $55 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 2.87% for JUDO.

Holdings Overlap

FTCS already in JUDO32.3%
JUDO already in FTCS20.6%

32.3% of FTCS's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 20.6% of JUDO's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 70 in JUDO, against full books of 102 and 128.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 54 positions for JUDO that do not appear in our book for FTCS (79.4% of the fund), and 34 for FTCS that do not appear in JUDO (67.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FTCSWeight in JUDODifference
AAPLApple, Inc2.07%4.70%2.63%
VVisa Inc Class A2.08%1.67%0.41%
MAMastercard Inc2.10%1.56%0.54%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.09%1.45%0.64%
KOCoca Cola Co.2.17%1.31%0.86%
EOGEog Resources Inc2.09%1.22%0.87%
AXPAmerican Express Co.1.76%1.45%0.31%
HDHome Depot Inc/The1.73%1.40%0.33%
CMEC M E Group Inc.2.22%0.90%1.32%
GRMNGarminltd.2.33%0.64%1.69%

32.3% of FTCS is already inside JUDO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FTCSJUDO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FTCS or JUDO?

FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while JUDO charges 0.55%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and JUDO?

32.3% of FTCS's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 20.6% of JUDO's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 70 in JUDO.

Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or JUDO?

FTCS yields 1.22% while JUDO yields 2.87%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JUDO better than FTCS?

FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.