FTCS vs MODL
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd US Sector ETF
Which is better, FTCS or MODL?
MODL has been ahead.
MODL has a lower expense ratio. MODL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | MODL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.46%Best |
| AUM | $7.5B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.70% |
| Holdings | 102 | 724 |
| YTD Return | +6.41% | +11.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +21.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.06% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -17.6% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $15,274 | $21,972Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 34.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Oct 11, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4 years).
FTCS vs MODL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
FTCS vs MODL Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and VictoryShares WestEnd US Sector ETF (MODL) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% while MODL returned +15.41%. Year to date, FTCS is up 6.41% versus a gain of 11.79% for MODL.
Over three years, FTCS compounded at +10.51% per year against +21.46% for MODL. Across the full 4-year window we track, MODL has the edge at +21.75% annualized vs +11.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MODL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 11.4% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for FTCS and -17.6% for MODL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while MODL charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $46 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.70% for MODL.
Holdings Overlap
60.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings MODL also owns. 18.7% of MODL's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 361 in MODL, against full books of 102 and 724.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 318 positions for MODL that do not appear in our book for FTCS (79.3% of the fund), and 20 for FTCS that do not appear in MODL (39.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in MODL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.07% | 6.16% | 4.09% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.08% | 1.49% | 0.59% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.27% | 1.20% | 1.07% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.09% | 1.34% | 0.75% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.23% | 1.05% | 1.18% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 2.10% | 1.12% | 0.98% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 2.34% | 0.75% | 1.59% |
| VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.15% | 0.77% | 1.38% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.91% | 1.00% | 0.91% |
| CSXCsx Corp | 1.93% | 0.54% | 1.39% |
60.6% of FTCS is already inside MODL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or MODL?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while MODL charges 0.46%. MODL is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCS or MODL?
Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% vs +15.41% for MODL, so MODL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTCS annualized +11.17% vs +21.75% for MODL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCS or MODL?
MODL has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 11.4% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: FTCS -12.6% vs MODL -17.6%.
Should I hold both FTCS and MODL?
FTCS and MODL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and MODL?
60.6% of FTCS's money is in holdings MODL also owns. 18.7% of MODL's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 361 in MODL.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or MODL?
FTCS yields 1.22% while MODL yields 0.70%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MODL better than FTCS?
MODL has a lower expense ratio. MODL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.