FTCS vs RVRB
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs Reverb ETF
Which is better, FTCS or RVRB?
RVRB has been ahead.
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. RVRB led over 1Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | RVRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.30%Best |
| AUM | $7.5B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 102 | 499 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $13,309 | $17,218Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 38.2% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Reverb ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Nov 3, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 202 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FTCS has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RVRB through Mar 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2022 to Mar 26, 2026 (3.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVRB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.1% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for FTCS and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $30 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
94.1% of FTCS's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 16.6% of RVRB's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
Most of FTCS is already inside RVRB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 275 days apart, FTCS as of Oct 2, 2026 and RVRB as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
47 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 493 in RVRB, against full books of 102 and 499.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 397 positions for RVRB that do not appear in our book for FTCS (79.3% of the fund), and 3 for FTCS that do not appear in RVRB (5.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in RVRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.07% | 5.40% | 3.33% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.89% | 1.28% | 0.61% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.08% | 1.04% | 1.04% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.09% | 0.84% | 1.25% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 2.10% | 0.76% | 1.34% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 2.34% | 0.44% | 1.90% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.17% | 0.50% | 1.67% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.27% | 0.28% | 1.99% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 2.00% | 0.55% | 1.45% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.23% | 0.25% | 1.98% |
94.1% of FTCS is already inside RVRB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or RVRB?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while RVRB charges 0.30%. RVRB is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, FTCS or RVRB?
RVRB has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.1% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: FTCS -12.6% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both FTCS and RVRB?
FTCS and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and RVRB?
94.1% of FTCS's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 16.6% of RVRB's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 493 in RVRB.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or RVRB?
FTCS yields 1.22% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RVRB better than FTCS?
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. RVRB led over 1Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.