FTCS vs WBIL
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Which is better, FTCS or WBIL?
Each has led over a different period.
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS led over the full window, WBIL over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTCS | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | $7.5B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 102 | 142 |
| YTD Return | +6.41% | +14.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +14.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +10.76%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.06% | +6.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.9% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,420 | $13,573Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 23.0% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2006 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Oct 14, 2026 (12.1 years).
FTCS vs WBIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.1 years both funds cover.
FTCS vs WBIL Performance
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% while WBIL returned +14.68%. Year to date, FTCS is up 6.41% versus a gain of 14.67% for WBIL.
Over three years, FTCS compounded at +10.51% per year against +10.76% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +6.06% and +6.30% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, FTCS has the edge at +9.31% annualized vs +4.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 11.9% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.9% for FTCS and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTCS charges 0.52% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $155 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTCS currently yields 1.22% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
28.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 19.0% of WBIL's money is in holdings FTCS also owns.
FTCS and WBIL share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 64 in WBIL, against full books of 102 and 142.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for WBIL that do not appear in our book for FTCS (78.3% of the fund), and 36 for FTCS that do not appear in WBIL (71.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTCS | Weight in WBIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.27% | 2.15% | 0.12% |
| CMECme Group, Inc | 2.22% | 1.97% | 0.25% |
| ROSTRoss Stores Inc | 2.02% | 2.06% | 0.04% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.23% | 1.83% | 0.40% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 2.08% | 1.94% | 0.14% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.05% | 1.88% | 0.17% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.17% | 1.65% | 0.52% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.09% | 0.83% | 1.26% |
| MMM3m Co. | 2.09% | 0.79% | 1.30% |
| WRBWr Berkley Corp | 1.99% | 0.81% | 1.18% |
28.8% of FTCS is already inside WBIL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTCS or WBIL?
FTCS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while WBIL charges 1.55%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $103 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTCS or WBIL?
Over the past year FTCS returned +5.59% vs +14.68% for WBIL, so WBIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), FTCS annualized +9.31% vs +4.57% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTCS or WBIL?
FTCS has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 11.9% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: FTCS -31.9% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both FTCS and WBIL?
FTCS and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTCS and WBIL?
28.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 19.0% of WBIL's is in holdings FTCS also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTCS and 64 in WBIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTCS or WBIL?
FTCS yields 1.22% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIL better than FTCS?
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS led over the full window, WBIL over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.