FTG vs PFUT
FullerThaler Behavioral Growth ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Which is better, FTG or PFUT?
PFUT costs less.
PFUT has a lower expense ratio. PFUT is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTG | PFUT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.64%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 49 | 72 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 20.0% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -44.9% |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.1% | 28.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fuller & Thaler Asset Management | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2026 | May 25, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 127 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FTG has data through Oct 14, 2026 and PFUT through Jun 9, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTG charges 0.79% per year while PFUT charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $64 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PFUT.
Holdings Overlap
7.8% of FTG's money is in holdings PFUT also owns. 4.5% of PFUT's money is in holdings FTG also owns.
FTG and PFUT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, FTG as of Oct 2, 2026 and PFUT as of Feb 27, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FTG and 68 in PFUT, against full books of 49 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 59 positions for PFUT that do not appear in our book for FTG (83.9% of the fund), and 43 for FTG that do not appear in PFUT (89.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTG and PFUT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTG or PFUT?
FTG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while PFUT charges 0.64%. PFUT is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FTG and PFUT?
7.8% of FTG's money is in holdings PFUT also owns. 4.5% of PFUT's is in holdings FTG also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FTG and 68 in PFUT.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTG or PFUT?
FTG yields 0.00% while PFUT yields 0.00%, so PFUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PFUT better than FTG?
PFUT has a lower expense ratio. PFUT is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.