FTMH vs VYM
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FTMH or VYM?
High Yield Municipal Bond against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTMH | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $646M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 521 | 608 |
| YTD Return | -2.06% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.70% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5%Best | 11.3% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Municipal Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 9, 1985 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTMH vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTMH vs VYM Performance
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTMH returned -1.70% while VYM returned +16.31%. Year to date, FTMH is down 2.06% versus a gain of 12.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 7.5% for FTMH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTMH charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTMH currently yields 4.57% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 107 holdings in FTMH and 602 in VYM, totalling 31.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 107 positions we hold weights for in FTMH and 602 in VYM, against full books of 521 and 608.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTMH and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTMH or VYM?
FTMH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTMH or VYM?
Over the past year FTMH returned -1.70% vs +16.31% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTMH or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 7.5% for FTMH.
Should I hold both FTMH and VYM?
FTMH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTMH or VYM?
FTMH yields 4.57% while VYM yields 2.37%, so FTMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FTMH?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.