FTMN vs VXUS
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FTMN or VXUS?
Municipal Minnesota against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTMN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $271M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.23% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 211 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -4.53% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.99% | +17.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Minnesota | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 1989 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTMN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTMN vs VXUS Performance
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTMN returned -3.99% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, FTMN is down 4.53% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTMN charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTMN currently yields 3.23% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 18 holdings in FTMN and 8,425 in VXUS, totalling 16.3% and 91.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 18 positions we hold weights for in FTMN and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 211 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTMN and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTMN or VXUS?
FTMN has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTMN or VXUS?
Over the past year FTMN returned -3.99% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTMN or VXUS?
FTMN yields 3.23% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so FTMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FTMN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.