FTRB vs GTOH
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
Which is better, FTRB or GTOH?
GTOH has been ahead.
FTRB has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTRB | GTOH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $706M | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 5.78% |
| Holdings | 681 | 397 |
| YTD Return | -1.76%Best | -3.90% |
| 1Y Return | -1.21% | - |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Dec 9, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTRB vs GTOH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTRB vs GTOH Performance
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, FTRB is down 1.76% versus a loss of 3.90% for GTOH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTRB charges 0.39% per year while GTOH charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $48 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTRB currently yields 4.43% against 5.78% for GTOH.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 558 holdings in FTRB and 131 in GTOH, totalling 52.5% and 73.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 558 positions we hold weights for in FTRB and 131 in GTOH, against full books of 681 and 397.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTRB | Weight in GTOH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNC 2.5 03/01/31Centene Corp 2.5% 03/01/2031 | 0.04% | 1.49% | 1.45% |
| AAP 3.9 04/15/30Advance Auto Parts Company Guar 04/30 3.9 | 0.05% | 0.19% | 0.14% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTRB and GTOH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTRB or GTOH?
FTRB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while GTOH charges 0.48%. FTRB is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTRB or GTOH?
FTRB yields 4.43% while GTOH yields 5.78%, so GTOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GTOH better than FTRB?
FTRB has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.