FTWO vs VYM
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FTWO or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $77M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 52 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +9.18% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.07% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.09%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $18,453Best | $16,093 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.6% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 31, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
FTWO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FTWO vs VYM Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +12.07% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, FTWO is up 9.18% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +24.09% per year against +18.60% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 11.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 0.95% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.1% of FTWO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.1% of VYM's money is in holdings FTWO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 52 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 554 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FTWO (88.7% of the fund), and 17 for FTWO that do not appear in VYM (45.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTWO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 7.18% | 2.70% | 4.48% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.23% | 1.54% | 2.69% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 4.11% | 0.54% | 3.57% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.74% | 0.65% | 1.09% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 1.69% | 0.46% | 1.23% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.20% | 0.44% | 0.76% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 1.25% | 0.38% | 0.87% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.18% | 0.43% | 0.75% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.67% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.35% | 0.08% | 1.27% |
31.1% of FTWO is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTWO or VYM?
Over the past year FTWO returned +12.07% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 11.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both FTWO and VYM?
FTWO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and VYM?
31.1% of FTWO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.1% of VYM's is in holdings FTWO also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO yields 0.95% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FTWO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.