FXG vs VTI
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FXG or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $208M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.18% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 82 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +2.03% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.45% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.98% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.19% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 16.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.0%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,700 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.4 years).
FXG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.4 years both funds cover.
FXG vs VTI Performance
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXG returned -0.45% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FXG is up 2.03% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FXG compounded at +3.98% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.19% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.17% annualized vs +6.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 14.8% for FXG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.0% for FXG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXG charges 0.63% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $3 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXG currently yields 2.18% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
84.2% of FXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FXG also owns.
Most of FXG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FXG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 82 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,125 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FXG (95.1% of the fund), and 3 for FXG that do not appear in VTI (5.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FXG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRPTFreshpet, Inc. | 4.57% | 0.00% | 4.57% |
| INGRIngredion Inc | 4.51% | 0.01% | 4.50% |
| PPCPilgrim'S Pride Corp | 4.38% | 0.00% | 4.38% |
| GISGeneral Mills Inc | 4.12% | 0.03% | 4.09% |
| SEBSeaboard Corp | 4.04% | 0.00% | 4.04% |
| MKCMccormick & Co-Non Vtg Shrs | 3.97% | 0.02% | 3.95% |
| COKECoca-cola Consolidated Inc | 3.61% | 0.01% | 3.60% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc | 3.45% | 0.07% | 3.38% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp | 3.20% | 0.09% | 3.11% |
| CPBCampbell Soup Co. | 3.16% | 0.01% | 3.15% |
84.2% of FXG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXG or VTI?
FXG has an expense ratio of 0.63% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FXG or VTI?
Over the past year FXG returned -0.45% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXG annualized +6.57% vs +9.17% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FXG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 14.8% for FXG. Worst drawdown: FXG -40.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FXG and VTI?
FXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FXG and VTI?
84.2% of FXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.5% of VTI's is in holdings FXG also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FXG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXG or VTI?
FXG yields 2.18% while VTI yields 1.06%, so FXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FXG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.