GAB vs NUDG
Gabelli Equity Trust vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, GAB or NUDG?
NUDG has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAB | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 10.96% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 682 | 43 |
| YTD Return | -8.60% | +2.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.60% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.88% | - |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 21, 1986 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GAB vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GAB vs NUDG Performance
Gabelli Equity Trust (GAB) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, GAB is down 8.60% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAB charges 1.50% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $61 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAB currently yields 10.96% against 0.50% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 72.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings GAB also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GAB, our book for it lists positions totalling 115.3% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
Most of NUDG is already inside GAB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, GAB as of Mar 31, 2026 and NUDG as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
28 positions in common, counted across the 655 positions we hold weights for in GAB and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 682 and 43.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAB | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.15% | 7.67% | 7.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.09% | 6.37% | 6.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.10% | 5.11% | 5.01% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.49% | 2.54% | 0.05% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 2.66% | 2.24% | 0.42% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 0.06% | 4.47% | 4.41% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.47% | 3.72% | 3.25% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.47% | 3.68% | 3.21% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.21% | 3.83% | 3.62% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.33% | 2.43% | 2.10% |
72.8% of NUDG is already inside GAB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAB or NUDG?
GAB has an expense ratio of 1.50% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GAB and NUDG?
At least 72.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings GAB also owns. Our book for GAB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 655 positions we hold weights for in GAB and 42 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAB or NUDG?
GAB yields 10.96% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so GAB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than GAB?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.