GAMR vs VTI
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GAMR or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +9.53% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.01% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.11%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.41% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,825 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 71.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.6 years).
GAMR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.6 years both funds cover.
GAMR vs VTI Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +3.01% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GAMR is up 9.53% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +24.11% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.41% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.86% annualized vs +14.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.47% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
49.0% of GAMR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.0% of VTI's money is in holdings GAMR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 48 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GAMR (82.6% of the fund), and 1 for GAMR that do not appear in VTI (5.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAMR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corporation | 9.41% | 6.88% | 2.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.38% | 5.11% | 4.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 9.43% | 1.70% | 7.73% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices | 9.53% | 1.04% | 8.49% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 4.28% | 0.12% | 4.16% |
| UUnity Software Inc. | 2.48% | 0.02% | 2.46% |
| RBLXROBLOX Corp | 2.29% | 0.04% | 2.25% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software Inc | 2.25% | 0.05% | 2.20% |
49.0% of GAMR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GAMR or VTI?
Over the past year GAMR returned +3.01% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GAMR annualized +14.86% vs +14.03% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both GAMR and VTI?
GAMR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and VTI?
49.0% of GAMR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.0% of VTI's is in holdings GAMR also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GAMR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.