GAPR vs GJUN
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, GAPR or GJUN?
Each has led over a different period.
GAPR led over 1Y, GJUN over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAPR | GJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $298M | $511M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +6.91%Best | +6.43% |
| 1Y Return | +9.03%Best | +8.70% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.25% | +12.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6%Best | 5.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0%Best | -11.0% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $13,861 | $14,082Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2023 | Jun 16, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
GAPR vs GJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
GAPR vs GJUN Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GAPR returned +9.03% while GJUN returned +8.70%. Year to date, GAPR is up 6.91% versus a gain of 6.43% for GJUN.
Over three years, GAPR compounded at +11.25% per year against +12.00% for GJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.9% compared with 4.6% for GAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for GAPR and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAPR charges 0.85% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GAPR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GAPR and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAPR or GJUN?
GAPR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GJUN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, GAPR or GJUN?
Over the past year GAPR returned +9.03% vs +8.70% for GJUN, so GAPR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAPR or GJUN?
GJUN has been the more volatile fund at 5.9% annualized versus 4.6% for GAPR. Worst drawdown: GAPR -9.0% vs GJUN -11.0%.
Should I hold both GAPR and GJUN?
GAPR and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAPR or GJUN?
GAPR yields 0.00% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so GJUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GJUN better than GAPR?
GAPR led over 1Y, GJUN over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.