GAUG vs SPXL

GAUG vs SPXL

Which is better, GAUG or SPXL?

Nearly the same fund. GAUG costs less.

GAUG has a lower expense ratio. SPXL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: GAUGHigher Returns: SPXL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGAUGSPXL
Expense Ratio0.85%Best0.87%
AUM$423M$7.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.52%
Holdings101,030
YTD Return+7.64%+30.47%Best
1Y Return+10.03%+39.94%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.32%+52.99%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+20.66%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%Best39.7%
Max Drawdown-10.1%Best-49.0%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$14,107$33,749Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionAug 18, 2023Nov 5, 2008

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

GAUG vs SPXL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare GAUG against instead:GAUG vs SPYGAUG vs QQQGAUG vs VOOGAUG vs VTISPXL against:SPXL vs VXUS

GAUG vs SPXL Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year GAUG returned +10.03% while SPXL returned +39.94%. Year to date, GAUG is up 7.64% versus a gain of 30.47% for SPXL.

Over three years, GAUG compounded at +12.32% per year against +52.99% for SPXL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPXL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.7% compared with 6.0% for GAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for GAUG and -49.0% for SPXL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GAUG charges 0.85% per year while SPXL charges 0.87%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $87 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.52% for SPXL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GAUG and SPXL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GAUGSPXL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GAUG or SPXL?

GAUG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SPXL charges 0.87%. GAUG is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GAUG or SPXL?

Over the past year GAUG returned +10.03% vs +39.94% for SPXL, so SPXL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GAUG or SPXL?

SPXL has been the more volatile fund at 39.7% annualized versus 6.0% for GAUG. Worst drawdown: GAUG -10.1% vs SPXL -49.0%.

Should I hold both GAUG and SPXL?

GAUG and SPXL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GAUG or SPXL?

GAUG yields 0.00% while SPXL yields 0.52%, so SPXL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPXL better than GAUG?

GAUG has a lower expense ratio. SPXL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.