GCPB vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Core Plus Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GCPB or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCPB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $148M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 702 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.11% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 30, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GCPB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GCPB vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Core Plus Bond ETF (GCPB) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GCPB is down 2.11% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCPB charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCPB currently yields 0.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings GCPB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GCPB, our book for it covers 43.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in GCPB and 506 in IVV, against full books of 702 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GCPB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.03% | 0.30% | 0.27% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCPB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCPB or IVV?
GCPB has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCPB or IVV?
GCPB yields 0.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GCPB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.