GCV vs RILA
Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund vs Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
Which is better, GCV or RILA?
Each has led over a different period.
RILA has a lower expense ratio. GCV led over the full window, RILA over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCV | RILA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.20% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $46M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.13% | 0.12% |
| Holdings | 149 | 342 |
| YTD Return | +2.26% | +6.72%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.49% | +4.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.50% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.97% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -20.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,881Best | $12,275 |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Indexperts |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Equity-oriented Balanced | Equity-oriented Balanced |
| Inception | Mar 31, 1995 | Dec 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
GCV vs RILA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
GCV vs RILA Performance
Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (GCV) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) is an ETF from Indexperts. Over the past year GCV returned +3.49% while RILA returned +4.95%. Year to date, GCV is up 2.26% versus a gain of 6.72% for RILA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RILA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.6% for GCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for GCV and -20.0% for RILA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCV charges 3.20% per year while RILA charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $320 vs $50 annually, a gap of $270 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCV currently yields 11.13% against 0.12% for RILA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.0% of RILA's money is in holdings GCV also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GCV, our book for it covers 34.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RILA and GCV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 94 days apart, GCV as of Jun 30, 2026 and RILA as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in GCV and 171 in RILA, against full books of 149 and 342.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCV and RILA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCV or RILA?
GCV has an expense ratio of 3.20% while RILA charges 0.50%. RILA is the cheaper option, by $270 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GCV or RILA?
Over the past year GCV returned +3.49% vs +4.95% for RILA, so RILA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GCV annualized +15.10% vs +12.06% for RILA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GCV or RILA?
RILA has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.6% for GCV. Worst drawdown: GCV -15.7% vs RILA -20.0%.
Should I hold both GCV and RILA?
GCV and RILA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GCV and RILA?
At least 5.0% of RILA's money is in holdings GCV also owns. Our book for GCV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in GCV and 171 in RILA.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCV or RILA?
GCV yields 11.13% while RILA yields 0.12%, so GCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RILA better than GCV?
RILA has a lower expense ratio. GCV led over the full window, RILA over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.