GDV vs SCHX
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, GDV or SCHX?
SCHX has been ahead.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDV | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.4B | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.50% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 715 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +6.53% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.90% | +16.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.57% | +22.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.80% | +12.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,558 | $18,068Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2003 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.9 years).
GDV vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.9 years both funds cover.
GDV vs SCHX Performance
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (GDV) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GDV returned +11.90% while SCHX returned +16.62%. Year to date, GDV is up 6.53% versus a gain of 13.08% for SCHX.
Over three years, GDV compounded at +20.57% per year against +22.27% for SCHX; over five years the annualized figures are +7.80% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +7.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.5% for SCHX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.1% for GDV and -34.3% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDV charges 1.30% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDV currently yields 5.50% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.4% of SCHX's money is in holdings GDV also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GDV, our book for it lists positions totalling 110.0% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
Most of SCHX is already inside GDV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, GDV as of Mar 31, 2026 and SCHX as of Oct 3, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
264 positions in common, counted across the 678 positions we hold weights for in GDV and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 715 and 752.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GDV | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.32% | 8.02% | 6.70% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.97% | 6.90% | 5.93% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.41% | 5.44% | 4.03% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.87% | 3.50% | 2.63% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.67% | 2.29% | 0.62% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.42% | 1.25% | 1.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.27% | 2.86% | 2.59% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.40% | 0.63% | 1.77% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.59% | 2.40% | 1.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.71% | 2.28% | 1.57% |
76.4% of SCHX is already inside GDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDV or SCHX?
GDV has an expense ratio of 1.30% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GDV or SCHX?
Over the past year GDV returned +11.90% vs +16.62% for SCHX, so SCHX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), GDV annualized +7.31% vs +13.05% for SCHX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GDV or SCHX?
GDV has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.5% for SCHX. Worst drawdown: GDV -58.1% vs SCHX -34.3%.
Should I hold both GDV and SCHX?
GDV and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GDV and SCHX?
At least 76.4% of SCHX's money is in holdings GDV also owns. Our book for GDV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 264 positions in common, counted across the 678 positions we hold weights for in GDV and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDV or SCHX?
GDV yields 5.50% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so GDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than GDV?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.