GDXY vs PFEB

GDXY vs PFEB

Which is better, GDXY or PFEB?

Each has led over a different period.

PFEB has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over the full window, PFEB over 1Y.

Lower Fees: PFEBHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGDXYPFEB
Expense Ratio1.00%0.79%Best
AUM$306M$896M
Dividend Yield81.80%0.00%
Holdings2818
YTD Return-10.44%+8.65%Best
1Y Return-6.69%+12.00%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+12.79%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.98%
Volatility (annualized)33.4%5.4%Best
Max Drawdown-37.0%-10.6%Best
$10,000 over 2.4 years$14,862Best$12,796
Fund FamilyYieldMax ETFInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 20, 2024Jan 31, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).

GDXY vs PFEB growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.

Compare GDXY against instead:GDXY vs SPYGDXY vs QQQGDXY vs VOOGDXY vs VTIPFEB against:PFEB vs VXUS

GDXY vs PFEB Performance

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year GDXY returned -6.69% while PFEB returned +12.00%. Year to date, GDXY is down 10.44% versus a gain of 8.65% for PFEB.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GDXY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 5.4% for PFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for GDXY and -10.6% for PFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GDXY charges 1.00% per year while PFEB charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $79 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDXY currently yields 81.80% against 0.00% for PFEB.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GDXY and PFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GDXYPFEB

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GDXY or PFEB?

GDXY has an expense ratio of 1.00% while PFEB charges 0.79%. PFEB is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GDXY or PFEB?

Over the past year GDXY returned -6.69% vs +12.00% for PFEB, so PFEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GDXY annualized +17.95% vs +10.82% for PFEB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GDXY or PFEB?

GDXY has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 5.4% for PFEB. Worst drawdown: GDXY -37.0% vs PFEB -10.6%.

Should I hold both GDXY and PFEB?

GDXY and PFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GDXY or PFEB?

GDXY yields 81.80% while PFEB yields 0.00%, so GDXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PFEB better than GDXY?

PFEB has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over the full window, PFEB over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.