GEND vs LSVD
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, GEND or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
GEND has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $6M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 33 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +15.57% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.77% | +30.07%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,510 | $14,693Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 35.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
GEND vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
GEND vs LSVD Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, GEND is up 15.57% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 10.8% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $40 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 3.06% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
38.4% of GEND's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 10.0% of LSVD's money is in holdings GEND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 33 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 120 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for GEND (89.6% of the fund), and 19 for GEND that do not appear in LSVD (52.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GEND | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.89% | 1.57% | 2.32% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.87% | 1.12% | 2.75% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 4.12% | 0.55% | 3.57% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.89% | 0.62% | 3.27% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp | 3.78% | 0.46% | 3.32% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 3.28% | 0.44% | 2.84% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.97% | 1.59% | 0.38% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.92% | 0.56% | 2.36% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.06% | 0.40% | 2.66% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 2.93% | 0.48% | 2.45% |
38.4% of GEND is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or LSVD?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while LSVD charges 0.40%. GEND is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GEND or LSVD?
Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +19.36% vs +25.40% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GEND or LSVD?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 10.8% for GEND. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both GEND and LSVD?
GEND and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and LSVD?
38.4% of GEND's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 10.0% of LSVD's is in holdings GEND also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or LSVD?
GEND yields 3.06% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than GEND?
GEND has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.