GEND vs PSIL
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, GEND or PSIL?
Each has led over a different period.
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. GEND is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $6M | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 7.45% |
| Holdings | 33 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +15.57% | +16.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.77%Best | +9.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -23.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 30.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3%Best | -34.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,510 | $17,167Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
GEND vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
GEND vs PSIL Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% while PSIL returned +9.75%. Year to date, GEND is up 15.57% versus a gain of 16.80% for PSIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 10.8% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -34.6% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $100 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 3.06% against 7.45% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
3.9% of GEND's money is in holdings PSIL also owns. 9.0% of PSIL's money is in holdings GEND also owns.
PSIL and GEND share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 33 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for GEND (53.6% of the fund), and 30 for GEND that do not appear in PSIL (86.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GEND and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or PSIL?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while PSIL charges 1.00%. GEND is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GEND or PSIL?
Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% vs +9.75% for PSIL, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +19.36% vs +37.42% for PSIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GEND or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 10.8% for GEND. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs PSIL -34.6%.
Should I hold both GEND and PSIL?
GEND and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and PSIL?
9.0% of PSIL's money is in holdings GEND also owns. 9.0% of PSIL's is in holdings GEND also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 29 in PSIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or PSIL?
GEND yields 3.06% while PSIL yields 7.45%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than GEND?
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y, PSIL over the full window. GEND is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.