GEND vs RFDA
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Which is better, GEND or RFDA?
GEND has been ahead.
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $6M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 2.00% |
| Holdings | 33 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +15.57%Best | +14.73% |
| 1Y Return | +19.77%Best | +16.68% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.07% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 11.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3%Best | -17.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,510Best | $13,387 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 30.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Jun 6, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
GEND vs RFDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
GEND vs RFDA Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management and ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% while RFDA returned +16.68%. Year to date, GEND is up 15.57% versus a gain of 14.73% for RFDA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RFDA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 10.8% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -17.8% for RFDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while RFDA charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $52 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 3.06% against 2.00% for RFDA.
Holdings Overlap
33.0% of GEND's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 20.3% of RFDA's money is in holdings GEND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 75 in RFDA, against full books of 33 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 61 positions for RFDA that do not appear in our book for GEND (77.0% of the fund), and 21 for GEND that do not appear in RFDA (61.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GEND | Weight in RFDA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.89% | 2.96% | 0.93% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.87% | 2.30% | 1.57% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.89% | 1.21% | 2.68% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.14% | 2.62% | 0.48% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 3.28% | 1.31% | 1.97% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.92% | 1.64% | 1.28% |
| ENB:CAEnbridge Inc. | 3.55% | 0.82% | 2.73% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.02% | 3.15% | 2.13% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.19% | 1.91% | 0.28% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 2.93% | 0.69% | 2.24% |
33.0% of GEND is already inside RFDA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or RFDA?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while RFDA charges 0.52%. GEND is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GEND or RFDA?
Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% vs +16.68% for RFDA, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +19.36% vs +18.72% for RFDA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GEND or RFDA?
RFDA has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 10.8% for GEND. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs RFDA -17.8%.
Should I hold both GEND and RFDA?
GEND and RFDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and RFDA?
33.0% of GEND's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 20.3% of RFDA's is in holdings GEND also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 75 in RFDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or RFDA?
GEND yields 3.06% while RFDA yields 2.00%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFDA better than GEND?
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.