GEND vs SIXA
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, GEND or SIXA?
GEND has been ahead.
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | SIXA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.47% |
| AUM | $6M | $540M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 1.96% |
| Holdings | 33 | 150 |
| YTD Return | +15.57% | +16.78%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.77%Best | +19.27% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 8.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -11.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,510Best | $13,474 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 34.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | May 11, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
GEND vs SIXA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
GEND vs SIXA Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management and ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% while SIXA returned +19.27%. Year to date, GEND is up 15.57% versus a gain of 16.78% for SIXA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GEND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.8% compared with 8.3% for SIXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -11.2% for SIXA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while SIXA charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $47 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 3.06% against 1.96% for SIXA.
Holdings Overlap
40.7% of GEND's money is in holdings SIXA also owns. 32.9% of SIXA's money is in holdings GEND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 50 in SIXA, against full books of 33 and 150.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for SIXA that do not appear in our book for GEND (67.1% of the fund), and 17 for GEND that do not appear in SIXA (49.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GEND | Weight in SIXA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.89% | 5.18% | 1.29% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 3.28% | 3.81% | 0.53% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.06% | 3.67% | 0.61% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.19% | 3.74% | 1.55% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.87% | 1.31% | 2.56% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.89% | 1.27% | 2.62% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 2.93% | 2.23% | 0.70% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.91% | 1.36% | 1.55% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.92% | 1.25% | 1.67% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.88% | 1.29% | 1.59% |
40.7% of GEND is already inside SIXA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or SIXA?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SIXA charges 0.47%. GEND is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GEND or SIXA?
Over the past year GEND returned +19.77% vs +19.27% for SIXA, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +19.36% vs +19.17% for SIXA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GEND or SIXA?
GEND has been the more volatile fund at 10.8% annualized versus 8.3% for SIXA. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs SIXA -11.2%.
Should I hold both GEND and SIXA?
GEND and SIXA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and SIXA?
40.7% of GEND's money is in holdings SIXA also owns. 32.9% of SIXA's is in holdings GEND also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 50 in SIXA.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or SIXA?
GEND yields 3.06% while SIXA yields 1.96%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXA better than GEND?
GEND has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.