GGM vs SECT
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, GGM or SECT?
SECT has been ahead.
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGM | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 10 | 19 |
| YTD Return | +11.45%Best | +10.58% |
| 1Y Return | +13.37% | +14.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.70% | +18.91%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7%Best | -21.7% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $12,660 | $17,035Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 100.0% |
| Fund Family | GGM Wealth Advisors | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2023 | Sep 5, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
GGM vs SECT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
GGM vs SECT Performance
GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) is an ETF from GGM Wealth Advisors and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC. Over the past year GGM returned +13.37% while SECT returned +14.28%. Year to date, GGM is up 11.45% versus a gain of 10.58% for SECT.
Over three years, GGM compounded at +8.70% per year against +18.91% for SECT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.2% for GGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for GGM and -21.7% for SECT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGM charges 0.94% per year while SECT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $69 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGM currently yields 1.40% against 0.69% for SECT.
Holdings Overlap
37.2% of GGM's money is in holdings SECT also owns. 15.1% of SECT's money is in holdings GGM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
2 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in GGM and 10 in SECT, against full books of 10 and 19.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for SECT that do not appear in our book for GGM (85.0% of the fund), and 3 for GGM that do not appear in SECT (61.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
37.2% of GGM is already inside SECT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGM or SECT?
GGM has an expense ratio of 0.94% while SECT charges 0.69%. SECT is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGM or SECT?
Over the past year GGM returned +13.37% vs +14.28% for SECT, so SECT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGM or SECT?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.2% for GGM. Worst drawdown: GGM -19.7% vs SECT -21.7%.
Should I hold both GGM and SECT?
GGM and SECT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGM and SECT?
37.2% of GGM's money is in holdings SECT also owns. 15.1% of SECT's is in holdings GGM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in GGM and 10 in SECT.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGM or SECT?
GGM yields 1.40% while SECT yields 0.69%, so GGM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SECT better than GGM?
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.