GGRW vs VOO
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GGRW or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $8M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 84 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +5.88% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.50% | +17.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.33%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.98% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,012 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.7 years).
GGRW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
GGRW vs VOO Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGRW returned +6.50% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, GGRW is up 5.88% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Over three years, GGRW compounded at +25.33% per year against +22.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.98% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.26% annualized vs +7.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for GGRW and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.40% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
91.9% of GGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 44.1% of VOO's money is in holdings GGRW also owns.
Most of GGRW is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 504 in VOO, against full books of 84 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GGRW (55.6% of the fund), and 3 for GGRW that do not appear in VOO (2.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGRW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corporation | 10.02% | 8.09% | 1.93% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.72% | 7.04% | 3.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.46% | 5.70% | 1.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 3.85% | 1.98% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc Cl C | 6.00% | 2.40% | 3.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.97% | 2.65% | 1.32% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A | 4.17% | 1.90% | 2.27% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.15% | 1.38% | 2.77% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc Com | 3.83% | 0.55% | 3.28% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.84% | 0.37% | 3.47% |
91.9% of GGRW is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. GGRW is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGRW or VOO?
Over the past year GGRW returned +6.50% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GGRW annualized +7.33% vs +14.26% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GGRW -50.3% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both GGRW and VOO?
GGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and VOO?
91.9% of GGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 44.1% of VOO's is in holdings GGRW also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW yields 0.40% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GGRW?
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.