GIND vs VOO
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GIND or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. GIND is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIND | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $160M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 127 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -10.02% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.61% | +17.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $9,499 | $14,458Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
GIND vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
GIND vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GIND returned -8.61% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, GIND is down 10.02% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GIND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 11.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for GIND and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIND charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIND currently yields 0.73% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of GIND's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings GIND also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 125 positions we hold weights for in GIND and 504 in VOO, against full books of 127 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 498 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GIND (99.7% of the fund), and 6 for GIND that do not appear in VOO (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GIND | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 0.86% | 0.05% | 0.81% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GIND and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIND or VOO?
GIND has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GIND or VOO?
Over the past year GIND returned -8.61% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GIND annualized -3.37% vs +27.86% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GIND or VOO?
GIND has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 11.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GIND -23.0% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both GIND and VOO?
GIND and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIND or VOO?
GIND yields 0.73% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GIND?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. GIND is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.