GJAN vs MARM
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January vs FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - March
Which is better, GJAN or MARM?
GJAN has been ahead.
GJAN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GJAN | MARM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $443M | $107M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +8.05%Best | +4.78% |
| 1Y Return | +11.35%Best | +6.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.30% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 1.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -2.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $12,856Best | $11,848 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jan 20, 2023 | Mar 26, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
GJAN vs MARM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
GJAN vs MARM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - March (MARM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% while MARM returned +6.26%. Year to date, GJAN is up 8.05% versus a gain of 4.78% for MARM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 1.9% for MARM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for GJAN and -2.7% for MARM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GJAN charges 0.85% per year while MARM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MARM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GJAN and MARM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GJAN or MARM?
GJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while MARM charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, GJAN or MARM?
Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% vs +6.26% for MARM, so GJAN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GJAN or MARM?
GJAN has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 1.9% for MARM. Worst drawdown: GJAN -10.6% vs MARM -2.7%.
Should I hold both GJAN and MARM?
GJAN and MARM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GJAN or MARM?
GJAN yields 0.00% while MARM yields 0.00%, so MARM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MARM better than GJAN?
GJAN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.