GJAN vs MKAM
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January vs MKAM ETF
Which is better, GJAN or MKAM?
GJAN has been ahead.
MKAM has a lower expense ratio. GJAN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GJAN | MKAM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $443M | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% |
| Holdings | 10 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +8.05%Best | +6.95% |
| 1Y Return | +11.35%Best | +9.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.30%Best | +10.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.1% | 5.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -5.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $14,976Best | $14,071 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | MKAM ETF, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jan 20, 2023 | Apr 12, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 12, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).
GJAN vs MKAM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
GJAN vs MKAM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and MKAM ETF (MKAM) is an ETF from MKAM ETF, LLC. Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% while MKAM returned +9.24%. Year to date, GJAN is up 8.05% versus a gain of 6.95% for MKAM.
Over three years, GJAN compounded at +12.30% per year against +10.63% for MKAM. Across the full 4-year window we track, GJAN has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs +10.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.1% compared with 5.5% for MKAM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for GJAN and -5.0% for MKAM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GJAN charges 0.85% per year while MKAM charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $55 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GJAN currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for MKAM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GJAN and MKAM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GJAN or MKAM?
GJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while MKAM charges 0.55%. MKAM is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GJAN or MKAM?
Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% vs +9.24% for MKAM, so GJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GJAN annualized +12.23% vs +10.25% for MKAM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GJAN or MKAM?
GJAN has been the more volatile fund at 6.1% annualized versus 5.5% for MKAM. Worst drawdown: GJAN -10.6% vs MKAM -5.0%.
Should I hold both GJAN and MKAM?
GJAN and MKAM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GJAN or MKAM?
GJAN yields 0.00% while MKAM yields 2.60%, so MKAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MKAM better than GJAN?
MKAM has a lower expense ratio. GJAN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.