GJAN vs PSMJ

GJAN vs PSMJ

Which is better, GJAN or PSMJ?

Each has led over a different period.

PSMJ has a lower expense ratio. GJAN led over 1Y, PSMJ over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: PSMJHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGJANPSMJ
Expense Ratio0.85%0.49%Best
AUM$443M$108M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1012
YTD Return+8.05%Best+7.57%
1Y Return+11.35%Best+10.19%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.30%+13.78%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.75%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%Best6.8%
Max Drawdown-10.6%Best-10.9%
$10,000 over 3.7 years$15,199$16,128Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJan 20, 2023Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.7 years).

GJAN vs PSMJ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.

Compare GJAN against instead:GJAN vs SPYGJAN vs QQQGJAN vs VOOGJAN vs VTIPSMJ against:PSMJ vs VXUS

GJAN vs PSMJ Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate July ETF (PSMJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% while PSMJ returned +10.19%. Year to date, GJAN is up 8.05% versus a gain of 7.57% for PSMJ.

Over three years, GJAN compounded at +12.30% per year against +13.78% for PSMJ. Across the full 4-year window we track, PSMJ has the edge at +13.79% annualized vs +11.98%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSMJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 6.0% for GJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for GJAN and -10.9% for PSMJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GJAN charges 0.85% per year while PSMJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $49 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSMJ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GJAN and PSMJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GJANPSMJ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GJAN or PSMJ?

GJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while PSMJ charges 0.49%. PSMJ is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GJAN or PSMJ?

Over the past year GJAN returned +11.35% vs +10.19% for PSMJ, so GJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GJAN annualized +11.98% vs +13.79% for PSMJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GJAN or PSMJ?

PSMJ has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 6.0% for GJAN. Worst drawdown: GJAN -10.6% vs PSMJ -10.9%.

Should I hold both GJAN and PSMJ?

GJAN and PSMJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GJAN or PSMJ?

GJAN yields 0.00% while PSMJ yields 0.00%, so PSMJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSMJ better than GJAN?

PSMJ has a lower expense ratio. GJAN led over 1Y, PSMJ over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.