GJAN vs XAUG
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August
Which is better, GJAN or XAUG?
GJAN has been ahead.
GJAN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GJAN | XAUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $443M | $26M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +8.27%Best | +6.61% |
| 1Y Return | +11.31%Best | +8.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.36%Best | +10.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 4.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -8.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $14,351Best | $13,444 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jan 20, 2023 | Aug 18, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.2 years).
GJAN vs XAUG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
GJAN vs XAUG Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJAN returned +11.31% while XAUG returned +8.80%. Year to date, GJAN is up 8.27% versus a gain of 6.61% for XAUG.
Over three years, GJAN compounded at +12.36% per year against +10.01% for XAUG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.2% compared with 4.2% for XAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for GJAN and -8.7% for XAUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GJAN charges 0.85% per year while XAUG charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XAUG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GJAN and XAUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GJAN or XAUG?
GJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XAUG charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, GJAN or XAUG?
Over the past year GJAN returned +11.31% vs +8.80% for XAUG, so GJAN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GJAN or XAUG?
GJAN has been the more volatile fund at 6.2% annualized versus 4.2% for XAUG. Worst drawdown: GJAN -10.6% vs XAUG -8.7%.
Should I hold both GJAN and XAUG?
GJAN and XAUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GJAN or XAUG?
GJAN yields 0.00% while XAUG yields 0.00%, so XAUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAUG better than GJAN?
GJAN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.