GJUN vs GNOV

GJUN vs GNOV

Which is better, GJUN or GNOV?

GNOV has been ahead.

GNOV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: GNOV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGJUNGNOV
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$511M$300M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+6.43%+8.34%Best
1Y Return+8.70%+13.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.00%+12.23%Best
Volatility (annualized)5.0%Best5.2%
Max Drawdown-11.0%-10.7%Best
$10,000 over 2.9 years$13,669$13,974Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJun 16, 2023Nov 17, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).

GJUN vs GNOV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.

Compare GJUN against instead:GJUN vs SPYGJUN vs QQQGJUN vs VOOGJUN vs VTIGNOV against:GNOV vs VXUS

GJUN vs GNOV Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% while GNOV returned +13.36%. Year to date, GJUN is up 6.43% versus a gain of 8.34% for GNOV.

Over three years, GJUN compounded at +12.00% per year against +12.23% for GNOV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GNOV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.2% compared with 5.0% for GJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for GJUN and -10.7% for GNOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GJUN charges 0.85% per year while GNOV charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GNOV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GJUN and GNOV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GJUNGNOV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GJUN or GNOV?

GJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GNOV charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, GJUN or GNOV?

Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% vs +13.36% for GNOV, so GNOV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GJUN or GNOV?

GNOV has been the more volatile fund at 5.2% annualized versus 5.0% for GJUN. Worst drawdown: GJUN -11.0% vs GNOV -10.7%.

Should I hold both GJUN and GNOV?

GJUN and GNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GJUN or GNOV?

GJUN yields 0.00% while GNOV yields 0.00%, so GNOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GNOV better than GJUN?

GNOV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.