GJUN vs SQMX
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June vs FT Vest US Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF
Which is better, GJUN or SQMX?
GJUN has been ahead.
GJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GJUN | SQMX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $511M | $55M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +6.43%Best | +4.77% |
| 1Y Return | +8.70%Best | +7.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 2.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -7.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,620Best | $11,346 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2023 | Dec 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
GJUN vs SQMX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
GJUN vs SQMX Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF (SQMX) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% while SQMX returned +7.41%. Year to date, GJUN is up 6.43% versus a gain of 4.77% for SQMX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.4% compared with 2.8% for SQMX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for GJUN and -7.4% for SQMX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GJUN charges 0.85% per year while SQMX charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SQMX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GJUN and SQMX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GJUN or SQMX?
GJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SQMX charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, GJUN or SQMX?
Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% vs +7.41% for SQMX, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GJUN annualized +8.70% vs +7.27% for SQMX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GJUN or SQMX?
GJUN has been the more volatile fund at 5.4% annualized versus 2.8% for SQMX. Worst drawdown: GJUN -11.0% vs SQMX -7.4%.
Should I hold both GJUN and SQMX?
GJUN and SQMX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GJUN or SQMX?
GJUN yields 0.00% while SQMX yields 0.00%, so SQMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SQMX better than GJUN?
GJUN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.