GJUN vs XAUG

GJUN vs XAUG

Which is better, GJUN or XAUG?

GJUN has been ahead.

GJUN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: GJUN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGJUNXAUG
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$511M$26M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1012
YTD Return+6.43%Best+6.36%
1Y Return+8.70%Best+8.57%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.00%Best+9.93%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%4.3%Best
Max Drawdown-11.0%-8.7%Best
$10,000 over 3.1 years$13,975Best$13,294
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJun 16, 2023Aug 18, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

GJUN vs XAUG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare GJUN against instead:GJUN vs SPYGJUN vs QQQGJUN vs VOOGJUN vs VTIXAUG against:XAUG vs VXUS

GJUN vs XAUG Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August (XAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% while XAUG returned +8.57%. Year to date, GJUN is up 6.43% versus a gain of 6.36% for XAUG.

Over three years, GJUN compounded at +12.00% per year against +9.93% for XAUG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 4.3% for XAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for GJUN and -8.7% for XAUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GJUN charges 0.85% per year while XAUG charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XAUG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GJUN and XAUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GJUNXAUG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GJUN or XAUG?

GJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while XAUG charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, GJUN or XAUG?

Over the past year GJUN returned +8.70% vs +8.57% for XAUG, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GJUN or XAUG?

GJUN has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 4.3% for XAUG. Worst drawdown: GJUN -11.0% vs XAUG -8.7%.

Should I hold both GJUN and XAUG?

GJUN and XAUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GJUN or XAUG?

GJUN yields 0.00% while XAUG yields 0.00%, so XAUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XAUG better than GJUN?

GJUN led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.