GK vs GRNY
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, GK or GRNY?
GRNY has been ahead.
GRNY has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $32M | $4.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 60 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +10.81% | +10.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.34% | +10.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.66% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.56% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6%Best | -24.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,908 | $13,651Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.7% | 27.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Fundstrat Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | Nov 7, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
GK vs GRNY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
GK vs GRNY Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital. Over the past year GK returned +8.34% while GRNY returned +10.25%. Year to date, GK is up 10.81% versus a gain of 10.83% for GRNY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 17.3% for GRNY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for GK and -24.2% for GRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while GRNY charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $75 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 0.13% for GRNY.
Holdings Overlap
53.1% of GK's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 23.2% of GRNY's money is in holdings GK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 42 in GRNY, against full books of 60 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for GRNY that do not appear in our book for GK (76.2% of the fund), and 16 for GK that do not appear in GRNY (45.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GK | Weight in GRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 10.42% | 2.62% | 7.80% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.14% | 2.47% | 5.67% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 7.28% | 2.20% | 5.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.48% | 2.43% | 3.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.24% | 2.50% | 2.74% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 4.26% | 2.36% | 1.90% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 3.72% | 2.28% | 1.44% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.87% | 1.96% | 1.91% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.65% | 2.18% | 1.47% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.05% | 2.20% | 1.15% |
53.1% of GK is already inside GRNY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or GRNY?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while GRNY charges 0.75%. GRNY is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GK or GRNY?
Over the past year GK returned +8.34% vs +10.25% for GRNY, so GRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GK annualized +14.38% vs +17.80% for GRNY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GK or GRNY?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 17.3% for GRNY. Worst drawdown: GK -23.6% vs GRNY -24.2%.
Should I hold both GK and GRNY?
GK and GRNY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and GRNY?
53.1% of GK's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 23.2% of GRNY's is in holdings GK also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 42 in GRNY.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or GRNY?
GK yields 0.07% while GRNY yields 0.13%, so GRNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GRNY better than GK?
GRNY has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.