GK vs MILN
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
Which is better, GK or MILN?
GK has been ahead.
MILN has a lower expense ratio. GK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | MILN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $32M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 60 | 164 |
| YTD Return | +11.09%Best | -4.63% |
| 1Y Return | +8.59%Best | -8.19% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.74%Best | +13.79% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.50%Best | +0.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 21.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -44.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,314Best | $10,095 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.7% | 33.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | May 4, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 15, 2026 (5.3 years).
GK vs MILN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
GK vs MILN Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year GK returned +8.59% while MILN returned -8.19%. Year to date, GK is up 11.09% versus a loss of 4.63% for MILN.
Over three years, GK compounded at +19.74% per year against +13.79% for MILN; over five years the annualized figures are +2.50% and +0.19% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 21.4% for MILN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -44.4% for MILN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while MILN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $50 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 0.33% for MILN.
Holdings Overlap
13.7% of GK's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 12.2% of MILN's money is in holdings GK also owns.
GK and MILN share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 80 in MILN, against full books of 60 and 164.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for MILN that do not appear in our book for GK (84.2% of the fund), and 22 for GK that do not appear in MILN (84.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GK and MILN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or MILN?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while MILN charges 0.50%. MILN is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GK or MILN?
Over the past year GK returned +8.59% vs -8.19% for MILN, so GK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GK or MILN?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 21.4% for MILN. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs MILN -44.4%.
Should I hold both GK and MILN?
GK and MILN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and MILN?
13.7% of GK's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 12.2% of MILN's is in holdings GK also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 80 in MILN.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or MILN?
GK yields 0.07% while MILN yields 0.33%, so MILN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MILN better than GK?
MILN has a lower expense ratio. GK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.