GK vs RJCA

GK vs RJCA

Which is better, GK or RJCA?

RJCA has been ahead.

RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. RJCA is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.

Lower Fees: RJCAHigher Returns (1Y): RJCALess Concentrated: RJCA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGKRJCA
Expense Ratio0.77%0.61%Best
AUM$32M$617M
Dividend Yield0.07%0.00%
Holdings6072
YTD Return+10.81%Best+4.02%
1Y Return+8.34%-
3Y Return (annualized)+19.66%-
5Y Return (annualized)+2.56%-
Top 10 Weight62.7%57.0%Best
Fund FamilyAdvisor SharesCarillon Family of Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 1, 2021Mar 21, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GK vs RJCA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare GK against instead:GK vs SPYGK vs QQQGK vs VOOGK vs VTIRJCA against:RJCA vs VXUS

GK vs RJCA Performance

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, GK is up 10.81% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GK charges 0.77% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $61 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 0.00% for RJCA.

Holdings Overlap

GK already in RJCA59.4%
RJCA already in GK49.4%

59.4% of GK's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 49.4% of RJCA's money is in holdings GK also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 60 and 72.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 60 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for GK (49.6% of the fund), and 16 for GK that do not appear in RJCA (39.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GKWeight in RJCADifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.14%15.22%7.08%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.10.42%3.87%6.55%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.24%7.85%2.61%
AAPLApple, Inc5.48%7.19%1.71%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C8.15%3.68%4.47%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.7.28%3.09%4.19%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.35%5.18%0.83%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.65%1.94%1.71%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc3.75%0.92%2.83%
BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A2.98%0.49%2.49%

59.4% of GK is already inside RJCA.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GKRJCA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GK or RJCA?

GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while RJCA charges 0.61%. RJCA is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GK and RJCA?

59.4% of GK's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 49.4% of RJCA's is in holdings GK also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in GK and 71 in RJCA.

Which pays a higher dividend, GK or RJCA?

GK yields 0.07% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so GK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RJCA better than GK?

RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. RJCA is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.