GKAT vs VTI
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GKAT or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GKAT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $167M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +9.49% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.85% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,589 | $11,999Best |
| Fund Family | Scharf Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
GKAT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
GKAT vs VTI Performance
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) is an ETF from Scharf Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GKAT returned +11.85% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GKAT is up 9.49% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GKAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for GKAT and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GKAT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GKAT currently yields 0.75% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.4% of VTI's money is in holdings GKAT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GKAT, our book for it covers 94.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and GKAT share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GKAT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 36 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GKAT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.32% | 5.11% | 1.21% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.03% | 3.41% | 2.62% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.98% | 6.88% | 5.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.49% | 1.70% | 3.79% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 6.05% | 0.06% | 5.99% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 4.06% | 0.25% | 3.81% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 3.94% | 0.24% | 3.70% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 3.77% | 0.16% | 3.61% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 3.65% | 0.25% | 3.40% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 3.47% | 0.25% | 3.22% |
20.4% of VTI is already inside GKAT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GKAT or VTI?
GKAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GKAT or VTI?
Over the past year GKAT returned +11.85% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GKAT annualized +14.35% vs +18.02% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GKAT or VTI?
GKAT has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GKAT -10.4% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both GKAT and VTI?
GKAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GKAT and VTI?
At least 20.4% of VTI's money is in holdings GKAT also owns. Our book for GKAT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GKAT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GKAT or VTI?
GKAT yields 0.75% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GKAT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.