GLOF vs SCHD
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GLOF or SCHD?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GLOF led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. GLOF is less concentrated, with 25.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $202M | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 715 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +15.32% | +24.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.57% | +29.85%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.97%Best | +16.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.53%Best | +9.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,044Best | $15,771 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.1%Best | 41.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 28, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.4 years).
GLOF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
GLOF vs SCHD Performance
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GLOF returned +20.57% while SCHD returned +29.85%. Year to date, GLOF is up 15.32% versus a gain of 24.55% for SCHD.
Over three years, GLOF compounded at +22.97% per year against +16.64% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +12.53% and +9.54% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +10.33% annualized vs +9.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.9% for GLOF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for GLOF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOF charges 0.20% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOF currently yields 1.54% against 3.24% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
4.3% of GLOF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 60.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings GLOF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 662 positions we hold weights for in GLOF and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 715 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GLOF (38.9% of the fund), and 202 for GLOF that do not appear in SCHD (58.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLOF | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.33% | 4.61% | 4.28% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.45% | 4.16% | 3.71% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.29% | 4.12% | 3.83% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.34% | 4.04% | 3.70% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.05% | 4.14% | 4.09% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.35% | 3.80% | 3.45% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.28% | 3.86% | 3.58% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.14% | 3.95% | 3.81% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.16% | 3.88% | 3.72% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.25% | 3.77% | 3.52% |
60.9% of SCHD is already inside GLOF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOF or SCHD?
GLOF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLOF or SCHD?
Over the past year GLOF returned +20.57% vs +29.85% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GLOF annualized +9.09% vs +10.33% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLOF or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.9% for GLOF. Worst drawdown: GLOF -36.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GLOF and SCHD?
GLOF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOF and SCHD?
60.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings GLOF also owns. 60.9% of SCHD's is in holdings GLOF also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 662 positions we hold weights for in GLOF and 98 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOF or SCHD?
GLOF yields 1.54% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GLOF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GLOF led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. GLOF is less concentrated, with 25.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.