GLXU vs VYM

GLXU vs VYM

Which is better, GLXU or VYM?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLXUVYM
Expense Ratio1.50%0.04%Best
AUM$11M$78.9B
Dividend Yield16.25%2.37%
Holdings3608
YTD Return-77.28%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-93.80%+15.96%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Volatility (annualized)180.7%10.4%Best
Max Drawdown-94.2%-6.7%Best
$10,000 over 1.2 years$1,152$12,146Best
Fund FamilyREX SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Value
InceptionAug 8, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).

GLXU vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLXU vs VYM Performance

T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLXU returned -93.80% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GLXU is down 77.28% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 180.7% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.2% for GLXU and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLXU charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLXU currently yields 16.25% against 2.37% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLXU and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLXUVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLXU or VYM?

GLXU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLXU or VYM?

Over the past year GLXU returned -93.80% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLXU annualized -83.48% vs +17.59% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLXU or VYM?

GLXU has been the more volatile fund at 180.7% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLXU -94.2% vs VYM -6.7%.

Should I hold both GLXU and VYM?

GLXU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLXU or VYM?

GLXU yields 16.25% while VYM yields 2.37%, so GLXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than GLXU?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.