GMAR vs UPRO

GMAR vs UPRO

Which is better, GMAR or UPRO?

UPRO has been ahead.

GMAR has a lower expense ratio. UPRO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: GMARHigher Returns: UPRO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGMARUPRO
Expense Ratio0.85%Best0.88%
AUM$428M$5.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.77%
Holdings10520
YTD Return+10.92%+29.25%Best
1Y Return+13.38%+38.25%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.33%+51.43%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+19.36%
Volatility (annualized)4.8%Best38.6%
Max Drawdown-9.1%Best-49.1%
$10,000 over 3.6 years$15,276$43,951Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)ProShares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 17, 2023Jun 23, 2009

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.6 years).

GMAR vs UPRO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.

Compare GMAR against instead:GMAR vs SPYGMAR vs QQQGMAR vs VOOGMAR vs VTIUPRO against:UPRO vs VXUS

GMAR vs UPRO Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year GMAR returned +13.38% while UPRO returned +38.25%. Year to date, GMAR is up 10.92% versus a gain of 29.25% for UPRO.

Over three years, GMAR compounded at +12.33% per year against +51.43% for UPRO. Across the full 4-year window we track, UPRO has the edge at +50.87% annualized vs +12.49%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UPRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.6% compared with 4.8% for GMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for GMAR and -49.1% for UPRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GMAR charges 0.85% per year while UPRO charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $88 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAR currently yields 0.00% against 0.77% for UPRO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GMAR and UPRO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GMARUPRO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GMAR or UPRO?

GMAR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while UPRO charges 0.88%. GMAR is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GMAR or UPRO?

Over the past year GMAR returned +13.38% vs +38.25% for UPRO, so UPRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GMAR annualized +12.49% vs +50.87% for UPRO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GMAR or UPRO?

UPRO has been the more volatile fund at 38.6% annualized versus 4.8% for GMAR. Worst drawdown: GMAR -9.1% vs UPRO -49.1%.

Should I hold both GMAR and UPRO?

GMAR and UPRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GMAR or UPRO?

GMAR yields 0.00% while UPRO yields 0.77%, so UPRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UPRO better than GMAR?

GMAR has a lower expense ratio. UPRO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.