GMAY vs HTUS

GMAY vs HTUS

Which is better, GMAY or HTUS?

Each has led over a different period.

GMAY has a lower expense ratio. GMAY led over 1Y, HTUS over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: GMAYHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGMAYHTUS
Expense Ratio0.85%Best0.96%
AUM$448M$174M
Dividend Yield0.00%1.19%
Holdings1027
YTD Return+6.79%+15.69%Best
1Y Return+9.14%Best+8.15%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.19%+19.36%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+6.41%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%Best16.7%
Max Drawdown-11.8%Best-27.0%
$10,000 over 3.4 years$14,598$14,625Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 19, 2023Jun 24, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).

GMAY vs HTUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.

Compare GMAY against instead:GMAY vs SPYGMAY vs QQQGMAY vs VOOGMAY vs VTIHTUS against:HTUS vs VXUS

GMAY vs HTUS Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is an ETF from Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC. Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% while HTUS returned +8.15%. Year to date, GMAY is up 6.79% versus a gain of 15.69% for HTUS.

Over three years, GMAY compounded at +12.19% per year against +19.36% for HTUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HTUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 6.0% for GMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for GMAY and -27.0% for HTUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GMAY charges 0.85% per year while HTUS charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $96 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.19% for HTUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GMAY and HTUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GMAYHTUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GMAY or HTUS?

GMAY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while HTUS charges 0.96%. GMAY is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GMAY or HTUS?

Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% vs +8.15% for HTUS, so GMAY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GMAY or HTUS?

HTUS has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 6.0% for GMAY. Worst drawdown: GMAY -11.8% vs HTUS -27.0%.

Should I hold both GMAY and HTUS?

GMAY and HTUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GMAY or HTUS?

GMAY yields 0.00% while HTUS yields 1.19%, so HTUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is HTUS better than GMAY?

GMAY has a lower expense ratio. GMAY led over 1Y, HTUS over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.