GMAY vs PSCJ
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May vs Pacer Swan SOS Conservative July ETF
Which is better, GMAY or PSCJ?
PSCJ has been ahead.
PSCJ has a lower expense ratio. PSCJ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMAY | PSCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $448M | $42M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +6.79% | +7.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.14% | +10.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.19% | +13.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.29% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0%Best | 7.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8%Best | -11.9% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $14,598 | $15,340Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 19, 2023 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
GMAY vs PSCJ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
GMAY vs PSCJ Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative July ETF (PSCJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% while PSCJ returned +10.05%. Year to date, GMAY is up 6.79% versus a gain of 7.57% for PSCJ.
Over three years, GMAY compounded at +12.19% per year against +13.98% for PSCJ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.4% compared with 6.0% for GMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for GMAY and -11.9% for PSCJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMAY charges 0.85% per year while PSCJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $49 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAY currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSCJ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GMAY and PSCJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMAY or PSCJ?
GMAY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while PSCJ charges 0.49%. PSCJ is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GMAY or PSCJ?
Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% vs +10.05% for PSCJ, so PSCJ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GMAY or PSCJ?
PSCJ has been the more volatile fund at 7.4% annualized versus 6.0% for GMAY. Worst drawdown: GMAY -11.8% vs PSCJ -11.9%.
Should I hold both GMAY and PSCJ?
GMAY and PSCJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMAY or PSCJ?
GMAY yields 0.00% while PSCJ yields 0.00%, so PSCJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSCJ better than GMAY?
PSCJ has a lower expense ratio. PSCJ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.