GMAY vs SPUU

GMAY vs SPUU

Which is better, GMAY or SPUU?

SPUU has been ahead.

SPUU has a lower expense ratio. SPUU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SPUUHigher Returns: SPUU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGMAYSPUU
Expense Ratio0.85%0.60%Best
AUM$448M$296M
Dividend Yield0.00%1.31%
Holdings101,020
YTD Return+6.79%+22.36%Best
1Y Return+9.14%+29.25%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.19%+38.29%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+18.51%
Volatility (annualized)6.0%Best25.7%
Max Drawdown-11.8%Best-35.2%
$10,000 over 3.4 years$14,598$28,213Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 19, 2023May 28, 2014

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).

GMAY vs SPUU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.

Compare GMAY against instead:GMAY vs SPYGMAY vs QQQGMAY vs VOOGMAY vs VTISPUU against:SPUU vs VXUS

GMAY vs SPUU Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% while SPUU returned +29.25%. Year to date, GMAY is up 6.79% versus a gain of 22.36% for SPUU.

Over three years, GMAY compounded at +12.19% per year against +38.29% for SPUU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.7% compared with 6.0% for GMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for GMAY and -35.2% for SPUU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GMAY charges 0.85% per year while SPUU charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $60 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.31% for SPUU.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GMAY and SPUU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GMAYSPUU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GMAY or SPUU?

GMAY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SPUU charges 0.60%. SPUU is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GMAY or SPUU?

Over the past year GMAY returned +9.14% vs +29.25% for SPUU, so SPUU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GMAY or SPUU?

SPUU has been the more volatile fund at 25.7% annualized versus 6.0% for GMAY. Worst drawdown: GMAY -11.8% vs SPUU -35.2%.

Should I hold both GMAY and SPUU?

GMAY and SPUU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GMAY or SPUU?

GMAY yields 0.00% while SPUU yields 1.31%, so SPUU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPUU better than GMAY?

SPUU has a lower expense ratio. SPUU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.