GOOP vs PMAY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google (GOOGL) ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, GOOP or PMAY?
Each has led over a different period.
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. GOOP led over 1Y and 3Y, PMAY over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOOP | PMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $26M | $820M |
| Dividend Yield | 15.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 21 | 12 |
| YTD Return | -4.58% | +7.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.02%Best | +9.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.27%Best | +12.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.5% | 4.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.9% | -9.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,533 | $14,645Best |
| Fund Family | Kurv | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2023 | Apr 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
GOOP vs PMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
GOOP vs PMAY Performance
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google (GOOGL) ETF (GOOP) is an ETF from Kurv and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year GOOP returned +19.02% while PMAY returned +9.34%. Year to date, GOOP is down 4.58% versus a gain of 7.13% for PMAY.
Over three years, GOOP compounded at +13.27% per year against +12.43% for PMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GOOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.5% compared with 4.2% for PMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.9% for GOOP and -9.4% for PMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOOP charges 0.99% per year while PMAY charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $79 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOOP currently yields 15.10% against 0.00% for PMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOOP and PMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOOP or PMAY?
GOOP has an expense ratio of 0.99% while PMAY charges 0.79%. PMAY is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GOOP or PMAY?
Over the past year GOOP returned +19.02% vs +9.34% for PMAY, so GOOP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GOOP or PMAY?
GOOP has been the more volatile fund at 35.5% annualized versus 4.2% for PMAY. Worst drawdown: GOOP -34.9% vs PMAY -9.4%.
Should I hold both GOOP and PMAY?
GOOP and PMAY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOOP or PMAY?
GOOP yields 15.10% while PMAY yields 0.00%, so GOOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMAY better than GOOP?
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. GOOP led over 1Y and 3Y, PMAY over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.